Register and login to submit your favorite /. comments!

Slashdot finally has a new theme! What do you think of it?

Submitted by veridicus on June 5, 2006 - 8:28am.
Awsome!
24% (164 votes)
Eh... pretty good.
45% (305 votes)
BORING!
9% (60 votes)
Uglier than CowboyNeal
18% (119 votes)
What's Slashdot?
4% (28 votes)
Total votes: 676
login or register to post comments

Duration

Submitted by veridicus on June 5, 2006 - 8:31am.

This poll will close in a couple of weeks.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Will we get readable fonts again?

Submitted by Anonymous on June 6, 2006 - 9:45am.

When will we be able to choose a serif font of a reasonable size?

[ login or register to post comments ]

It's not the font - its too much contrast ...

Submitted by Anonymous on June 6, 2006 - 8:28pm.

I thought it was the itty-bitty font as well, and was bitching about it ... then I noticed my own site uses the same size font - but I can read it! Why? Because its not lost on a glaring expanse of white. FWIW, the stylesheet has the following declarations:

background-color: #bbbbbb;
font-size: 10px;

But overall, the theme sux. Why not let us choose our own theme, like registered users can with postnuke?

[ login or register to post comments ]

"Forced" contrast?

Submitted by veridicus on June 7, 2006 - 8:48am.

Is it that the background is "forced" white? When I installed the themes here at Seen on Slash I removed the background color setting completely, so if you set your browser to a prefered background color you'll see it. Is that it? Or should the background be set to something off-white in the CSS?

BTW, registered users here at Seen on Slash can also choose among 4 themes. Actually they're the same basic theme with different colors. I prefer blue.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Egads the small font size

Submitted by Anonymous on June 26, 2006 - 8:59am.

Egads the small font size sucks.

[ login or register to post comments ]

2 things

Submitted by veridicus on June 5, 2006 - 8:54am.

I've only been on it for a few minutes but found 2 things in particular I don't like.

The "Read More" link on a story should be on the left, not all the way on the right. I realize clicking the comment count does the same thing, but I have a habit of clicking "Read More". And it's more intuitive on the left.

The comment moderation is aligned right of the comment title. I like to see the moderation, but it's not natural to look all the way to the right side to read it. I think it should be below the title but only displayed if the comment was moderated. Otherwise just hide it.

Plus there might be a bug. I don't see any "narrow" stories on the front page today (just title, no body). Usually I see at least 2 or 3.

[ login or register to post comments ]

124134 out of 128341984

Submitted by Anonymous on June 6, 2006 - 1:35am.

I barely even noticed since I always clicked the smaller of the x out of X comments link. But, the moderation should definitely not be on the right.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Me, too; unless, of course,

Submitted by Anonymous on June 8, 2006 - 5:45pm.

Me, too; unless, of course, it's missing because no one has posted yet.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Another update

Submitted by veridicus on June 8, 2006 - 10:18pm.

Tonight Slashdot fixed my only two complaints. Maybe CmdrTaco saw this poll. :)

Considering many people assumed their complaints were being ignored I'm pleased there was an update within 4 days.

[ login or register to post comments ]

A better question:

Submitted by Anonymous on June 5, 2006 - 1:25pm.

If they offered both the "new Coke" and "Classic Coke" versions of Slashdot (via profile setting) and allowed people to "change back" to the old CSS, what percentage of active readers would choose to do so?

I think I'd switch back just for the old font.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Mabye we'll see it in the Slashdotter Firefox Extension soon

Submitted by Anonymous on June 7, 2006 - 6:46pm.

We can only hope. Or write it ourselves and submit as a patch. Or something.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Some breakages

Submitted by linvir on June 5, 2006 - 5:18pm.

If people are going to be looking here, I have a few things:

  • Some of the navigation lists are crapped up in Konqueror
  • Mysterious Future title-only boxes no longer appear red
  • The italics tag ought to work like normal in user comments
  • Paragraphs are broken in user info boxes

All in all I absolutely love the new design, but I'm incredibly disappointed by the apparent lack of testing.

[ login or register to post comments ]

blockquotes don't work

Submitted by Anonymous on June 6, 2006 - 2:37am.

blockquotes don't work either.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Yes they do

Submitted by Anonymous on June 6, 2006 - 9:32am.

They just have a bar on the left side now. Unless it's a bug in the CSS rendering of the browser you use.

[ login or register to post comments ]

No, they don't

Submitted by Anonymous on June 7, 2006 - 7:45am.

Blockquotes are completely broken in journal entries. Slashdot has transfered the functionality to italics (WTF?) and set blockquote tags to essentially work as line breaks.


This JE gives examples of the three major issues: poor paragraph formatting, italics turned to blockquotes (and why that's bad), and blockquotes turned to line breaks.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Another issue

Submitted by linvir on June 13, 2006 - 5:25am.

The titlebar for comments is completely and utterly screwed up in Firefox on Windows and Linux. Firefox is by far the most popular browser on Slashdot, so, uh... what the fuck?

[ login or register to post comments ]

overall good, fonts too darn small

Submitted by Anonymous on June 6, 2006 - 7:17am.

Basically it's a cleaner version of what they already had. So in that sense, it succeeds at its goal.

However, the font size is too dang small! I'm only in my 30s; I shouldn't have to strain to read. You'd think a site that's been around as long as \. would realize that you don't muck with the default body font size. I hope they change it soon.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Agreed

Submitted by linvir on June 6, 2006 - 7:00pm.

Most of the font-size definitions in the CSS are 93%.
What the fuck? What kind of design choice is that? All default font sizes no matter what they are, are universally 7% too big?

[ login or register to post comments ]

Seconded

Submitted by Anonymous on June 7, 2006 - 12:57am.

I noticed the same thing. The most retarded thing ever, made my eyes strain until I put an override in my user stylesheet to bring it back to default size.

You can also move the moderation score and the "read more" links back to the left side via CSS overrides, just make sure to change their "position" attribute to "relative" (it's "absolute" now), and then adjust "top" and "left" (otherwise it will be slightly misaligned). Also, don't forget to add the "!important" directive to your CSS rules, so they take effect.

[ login or register to post comments ]

CSS

Submitted by Anonymous on June 9, 2006 - 11:15am.

Is there a nice example of CSS rule declaration overriding default /. settings for the computer illiterates out there?

[ login or register to post comments ]

user.css

Submitted by Anonymous on June 21, 2006 - 5:05pm.

#frame #wrapper {font-family: Verdana; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit;}

[ login or register to post comments ]

Does this work in IE?

Submitted by Anonymous on July 7, 2006 - 7:04pm.

Does this work in IE?

[ login or register to post comments ]

More eye strain

Submitted by Anonymous on June 8, 2006 - 4:07am.

More eye strain, we've to go across miles of screen real estate to see ratings, colour contrasts tooooooooooo deep/ tooooooooooooo pronounced. Its bad on the eyes. Good design, though - but the colours just kill your eyes.

[ login or register to post comments ]

When did Konqueror stop having good CSS support?

Submitted by Anonymous on June 8, 2006 - 10:01am.

Isn't Konqueror one of the few Acid2 browsers? Why are the nav. links screwed up?

[ login or register to post comments ]

Summary of issues

Submitted by veridicus on June 8, 2006 - 10:15am.

In a week or so I'll gather up all the complaints and post a list. Has anyone seen a list elsewhere? Someone's JE maybe?

[ login or register to post comments ]

I stopped reading slashdot

Submitted by Anonymous on June 8, 2006 - 12:47pm.

I stopped reading slashdot because of the new design. The "read more" is in the wrong place, moderation is in the wrong place, the design is wasteful in that it uses most of the space for "design artifacts", the font is pretty bad (I usually don't have problems with non-serif fonts, but this is virtually unreadable), and somehow, it feels slower i.e. heavier on the machine.

[ login or register to post comments ]

Agreed, except for the following

Submitted by Anonymous on June 18, 2006 - 9:21pm.

I stopped reading slashdot because of the new design.

Pitiful.

I usually don't have problems with non-serif fonts, but this is virtually unreadable

Total crap.

[ login or register to post comments ]